Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether goods detained for non-production of an e-transit pass could be ordered to be released on payment of fine in light of the departmental circular and the available supporting documents.
Analysis: The detention was founded on the absence of the e-transit pass, but the dealer relied on other accompanying documents and on the departmental circular issued after considering the manner in which check-post authorities should deal with such cases. The circular recognised that where a dealer produces sufficient legally valid and reliable documentary evidence showing that the goods had actually crossed the State borders, such evidence may be accepted as proof of inter-State movement. The case was also noted to be a first instance of violation, and the earlier departmental guidance did not support harsh detention in such circumstances.
Conclusion: The goods were directed to be released on payment of fine of Rs. 2,000, and the detention was not sustained as an absolute bar to release.