Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appeal was maintainable without compliance with the mandatory pre-deposit requirement under Section 129E of the Customs Act, 1962.
Analysis: The appeal challenged a penalty imposed under the Customs Act. The applicable pre-deposit requirement, as amended, required deposit of 7.5% of the penalty as a condition precedent for hearing the appeal. As no such compliance had been made, the statutory prerequisite for entertaining the appeal remained unsatisfied.
Conclusion: The appeal was held to be not maintainable and was dismissed.
Final Conclusion: Non-compliance with the mandatory pre-deposit condition resulted in dismissal of the appeal at the threshold.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the statute makes pre-deposit a condition precedent for hearing an appeal, failure to comply renders the appeal not maintainable.