Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 could be levied where both the returned income and the assessed income were nil.
Analysis: The admitted position was that the income disclosed in the return and the income assessed were both nil. On that basis, no case was made out for imposition of penalty under Section 271(1)(c). The proposed challenge did not give rise to any substantial question of law.
Conclusion: Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) was not leviable on the facts stated, and the appeal failed at the admission stage.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the returned income and the assessed income are both nil, penalty for concealment under Section 271(1)(c) is not attracted on those facts.