TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal Emphasizes Factors Beyond Guideline Values in Property Valuation</h1> <h3>The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Business Circle – I, Chennai Versus Ms. K.A. Fathima</h3> The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Business Circle – I, Chennai Versus Ms. K.A. Fathima - TMI Issues:Computation of capital gain based on fair market value as on 01.04.1981.Analysis:The appeal pertains to the computation of capital gain for the assessment year 2009-10, focusing on the determination of fair market value as on 01.04.1981. The Assessing Officer relied on the guideline value of &8377; 27,000 per ground, while the assessee computed the index cost of acquisition at &8377; 1,20,03,750 by adopting a fair market value of &8377; 20,62,500. The dispute centered around whether the guideline value accurately reflected the market value. The CIT(Appeals) considered factors such as the location of the property, infrastructure facilities, public access, and proximity to amenities in determining the fair market value. The property in question was situated in a prime area with various facilities nearby, leading the CIT(Appeals) to accept the assessee's valuation as reasonable and justifiable.Regarding the building's value, the Assessing Officer noted its age and demolition in 1983, leading to a limited market value after depreciation. The assessee valued the building at &8377; 7,50,000 per ground, while the CIT(Appeals) found that the remains of the demolished building could have fetched &8377; 15 lakhs in 1982. The CIT(Appeals) deemed the assessee's valuation of 46% of &8377; 15 lakhs as reasonable, emphasizing the importance of determining the market value rather than book value. The Tribunal concurred with the CIT(Appeals) on both the fair market value and the building's valuation, dismissing the Revenue's appeal and confirming the lower authority's decision.In conclusion, the Tribunal upheld the fair market value estimation and building valuation, emphasizing the importance of considering various factors beyond guideline values in determining property values. The decision highlighted the need to assess market value accurately based on location, amenities, and potential development prospects, rather than solely relying on guideline values for stamp duty purposes. The judgment reaffirmed the significance of thorough evaluation in capital gain computations to ensure fair and reasonable assessments.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
