CENVAT credit on input services allowed for plant operations, while employee catering credit required verification of cost recovery.

CENVAT credit was examined for employee catering under a statutory canteen facility and for tent, design, supply and erection services used for storage protection and pipeline rerouting. Credit on catering service depended on verification of the actual cost recovered from employees, because the records showed subsidised recovery and the factual incidence of the expense required confirmation; the claim was therefore remanded for limited verification. Credit on tent service and the related design, supply and erection services was allowed because those services had a clear nexus with manufacture and plant operations, including protection of raw materials during the monsoon and expansion-related rerouting work, and were treated as input services.

---

---

Issues: (i) whether CENVAT credit was admissible on catering service provided to employees as a statutory canteen facility, and (ii) whether CENVAT credit was admissible on tent service, design, supply and erection services used for storage protection and rerouting of pipeline works.

Issue (i): Whether CENVAT credit was admissible on catering service provided to employees as a statutory canteen facility.

Analysis: The canteen facility was treated as a statutory requirement connected with the assessee's business, but the records showed that catering charges had been recovered from employees at subsidized rates. The service tax credit was therefore dependent on the actual incidence and recovery of the catering cost, and the factual position required verification.

Conclusion: CENVAT credit on catering service was not finally upheld and the issue was remanded for ascertainment of the actual cost recovered from employees.

Issue (ii): Whether CENVAT credit was admissible on tent service, design, supply and erection services used for storage protection and rerouting of pipeline works.

Analysis: These services were found to have nexus with the manufacture of the final product, as they were used in the plant for protecting raw materials during the monsoon season and for the expansion-related rerouting work. Such services fell within the scope of input service under the governing CENVAT credit definition.

Conclusion: CENVAT credit on tent service, design, supply and erection services was allowed in favour of the assessee.

Final Conclusion: The denial of credit was set aside in part, credit was allowed for the services found to be input services, and the catering-related claim was sent back for limited verification.

Ratio Decidendi: Services having a clear nexus with manufacture or business operations qualify as input services for CENVAT credit, while employee catering credit depends on the actual cost incidence and recovery verified on facts.

---