Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an amount debited in a duty entitlement pass book under an exemption scheme could be treated as payment of duty so as to sustain a claim for refund after the assessment was set aside.
Analysis: The claimed excess duty was not paid in cash but was adjusted by debit in the pass book under the duty entitlement pass book scheme operated through Notification No. 104/95 dated 05.09.1997. Such a debit, made only for the operational working of the exemption scheme, does not constitute payment of duty. Once the assessment was set aside, the appellant could not claim a refund of duty that had never been actually paid. At most, the appellant could seek restoration of credit in the pass book, but that would not give any present benefit as the scheme was no longer in operation.
Conclusion: The refund claim was not maintainable and was rightly rejected.