Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, on a true interpretation of section 10 and section 24(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1922, with its first proviso, a loss suffered in speculation business could be set off against profits from non-speculative business.
Analysis: The proviso inserted by section 3 of the Finance Act, 1953 was read as governing the computation of profits and gains from business and as excluding speculative losses from being taken into account except to the extent of speculative profits. The reasoning adopted in earlier High Court decisions was accepted, including the view that the proviso was not confined to a narrow procedural function within section 24(1) but operated as a substantive restriction on the computation of business income. The later scheme of the Income-tax Act, 1961, including section 73, was referred to as consistent with that interpretation, though not as a basis for construing the earlier Act.
Conclusion: The assessee was not entitled to set off speculative loss against profits of non-speculative business. The question was answered in the negative, in favour of the Revenue.
Ratio Decidendi: A proviso may operate as a substantive restriction on computation where its language and the statutory scheme show a legislative intention to exclude a class of losses from set-off against business profits.