Modvat credit requires valid invoices from a registered person; invoices in an unregistered concern's name cannot sustain credit.

Modvat credit was held inadmissible where invoices were issued in the name of an unregistered concern and did not emanate from a registered manufacturer in the manner required by the governing circular and Modvat procedure. The requirement that the document be issued by a registered person was treated as foundational, and only minor procedural defects could be ignored after that threshold was met. Because the invoices failed to satisfy the prescribed conditions for valid credit documents, the credit could not be sustained and the challenge to the demand failed.

---

---

Issues: Whether Modvat credit was admissible on invoices issued in the name of an unregistered division/dealer and whether such invoices could be treated as valid documents for availing credit.

Analysis: The invoices bore the name and address of M/s. Bela Instruments, which was not a registered dealer or trader, and the documents did not emanate from the registered manufacturer in the manner required by the governing circular and Modvat procedure. The Court held that the requirement of issuance by a registered person was foundational, and only then could minor procedural deviations be overlooked. Since the invoices did not satisfy the prescribed conditions under the circular governing valid documents for Modvat credit, the credit could not be sustained.

Conclusion: Modvat credit was rightly denied and the challenge to the demand failed.

Final Conclusion: The appeal did not succeed and the disallowance of Modvat credit was upheld.

Ratio Decidendi: For Modvat credit, the document must be a valid invoice issued in accordance with the prescribed procedure by a registered person or entity; credit cannot be allowed on invoices issued in the name of an unregistered concern merely because the inputs were duty paid or the use of inputs is otherwise traceable.

---