Service Tax Demand Upheld for Crane Hiring Charges: Legal Battle Ends with Waiver and Stay

The Commissioner confirmed a Service Tax demand against a Proprietorship Concern for alleged non-payment related to "Crane Hiring Charges." The dispute centered on whether crane hiring constituted "Supply of Tangible Goods" under the Finance Act, 1994. The Adjudicating Authority deemed it taxable post-16-5-2008 based on agreements. However, citing precedents, the Petitioner argued otherwise. The Petitioner successfully demonstrated a strong case for waiver of pre-deposit, leading to a full waiver and a stay on further proceedings pending appeal resolution. The appeal was set for a regular hearing, and the Stay Petition was disposed of accordingly.

---

---

Issues: Service Tax demand, Supply of Tangible Goods, Prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit

Service Tax Demand: The Commissioner confirmed a Service Tax demand of Rs. 42,24,192, dropped a demand of Rs. 10,03,719, and ordered interest and penalty. The Petitioner, a Proprietorship Concern, had obtained Service Tax Registration for "Commercial or Industrial Construction" and "Financial Leasing" services. A show cause notice alleged non-payment of Service Tax despite providing taxable services, specifically mentioning amounts received under "Crane Hiring Charges" during 2007-08 and 2008-09. The dispute arose regarding whether the hiring of cranes constituted "Supply of Tangible Goods" u/s Section 65(105)(zzzzj) of the Finance Act, 1994, effective from 16-5-2008. The Petitioner argued that it did not amount to "Supply of Tangible Goods" as they had no control over the cranes after handing them over to the contractee.

Supply of Tangible Goods: The Adjudicating Authority accepted that hiring of cranes was not taxable up to 15-5-2008 but considered it taxable under "Supply of Tangible Goods" from 16-5-2008 based on the agreements for crane hire. The Authority concluded that the transaction fell within the ambit of "Supply of Tangible Goods" as specified in the Act. The Petitioner cited judgments from Karnataka and Gauhati High Courts to argue that the hiring out of cranes amounted to a transfer of goods for use, subject to sales tax under State laws, and thus fell outside the taxable service under the Act.

Prima Facie Case for Waiver of Pre-deposit: Relying on judgments from Karnataka and Gauhati High Courts, the Petitioner established a strong prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of further proceedings pending the appeal's disposal. Consequently, the waiver of pre-deposit was granted in full, and all proceedings following the Adjudication Order were stayed until the appeal's resolution. The appeal was scheduled for a regular hearing, and the Stay Petition was disposed of accordingly.

---