Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        1993 (1) TMI 5 - HC - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Additional income-tax on excess dividend is rectifiable and remains payable despite section 80J exemption. An undisputed omission to apply the Finance Act, 1968 additional income-tax levy to excess dividend was a mistake apparent from the record and was ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Additional income-tax on excess dividend is rectifiable and remains payable despite section 80J exemption.

                          An undisputed omission to apply the Finance Act, 1968 additional income-tax levy to excess dividend was a mistake apparent from the record and was rectifiable under section 154 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The levy under clause I(B) of Paragraph F of Part I of the First Schedule applied where the company's dividend exceeded the prescribed level, and the excess dividend determined the amount of income subjected to tax. Dividend declared out of profits exempt under section 80J did not escape the special levy, because the charge operated on a portion of total income rather than on the dividend itself. The reference was answered in favour of the Revenue on all substantive questions.




                          Issues: (i) Whether non-application of the additional income-tax provision in the Finance Act, 1968, constituted a mistake apparent from the record capable of rectification under section 154 of the Income-tax Act, 1961; (ii) Whether excess dividend declared by the company attracted clause I(B) of Paragraph F of Part I of the First Schedule to the Finance Act, 1968; (iii) Whether additional income-tax was payable where the dividend was declared out of profits exempt under section 80J of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

                          Issue (i): Whether non-application of the additional income-tax provision in the Finance Act, 1968, constituted a mistake apparent from the record capable of rectification under section 154 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

                          Analysis: The omission to apply the Finance Act, 1968, to admitted and undisputed facts was treated as an obvious and patent error. The figures, the excess dividend, and the tax consequence were not in dispute, and the correction did not require any long-drawn process of reasoning.

                          Conclusion: Yes. The omission was a mistake apparent from the record and was rightly rectified under section 154 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

                          Issue (ii): Whether excess dividend declared by the company attracted clause I(B) of Paragraph F of Part I of the First Schedule to the Finance Act, 1968.

                          Analysis: Clause I(B) levies additional income-tax on a portion of the total income of the company, quantified with reference to the relevant excess dividend. On the admitted facts, the dividend exceeded ten per cent of the paid-up equity share capital, and the excess amount determined the quantum of income on which the levy operated.

                          Conclusion: Yes. The excess dividend attracted clause I(B) of Paragraph F of Part I of the First Schedule to the Finance Act, 1968.

                          Issue (iii): Whether additional income-tax was payable where the dividend was declared out of profits exempt under section 80J of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

                          Analysis: The levy under the Finance Act, 1968, was on a part of the company's total income, not on the dividend itself. Amounts exempted for the purpose of normal tax computation still formed part of total income, and the exemption under section 80J did not take the receipts outside the concept of total income for this levy.

                          Conclusion: Yes. Additional income-tax remained payable notwithstanding that the dividend was declared out of profits exempt under section 80J of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

                          Final Conclusion: The reference was answered in favour of the Revenue on all substantive questions, and the levy and rectification were upheld.

                          Ratio Decidendi: Where the statutory levy is imposed on a specified portion of total income, determined by reference to excess dividend, an exemption affecting normal tax computation does not remove that income from total income for the purpose of the special levy, and an undisputed omission to apply that levy is rectifiable under section 154.


                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found