Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled to deduction of the amount written off as a bad debt under section 10(2)(xi) of the Income-tax Act, 1922.
Analysis: The debt had originally been advanced in the course of the assessee's money-lending business and was secured by a usufructuary mortgage. By a subsequent bona fide agreement entered into after section 9A of the Madras Agriculturists Debt Relief Act, 1938 came into force, the parties reworked the liability and the assessee accepted a reduced amount in full discharge of the mortgage debt. The fresh agreement superseded the earlier contract, so the balance became irrecoverable independently of any enquiry into the debtor's solvency. Since the assessee had in fact lost the right to recover the written-off amount under the revised bargain, the statutory requirements for bad debt deduction were satisfied.
Conclusion: The deduction was allowable and the question was answered in the affirmative in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a genuine subsequent agreement lawfully extinguishes part of an earlier recoverable debt, the amount so foregone becomes irrecoverable and qualifies for deduction as a bad debt if the statutory conditions are otherwise met.