1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Tribunal grants Modvat credit for LDO & FO used as fuel, aligning with CENVAT Credit Rules</h1> The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing Modvat credit for Light Diesel Oil (LDO) and Furnace Oil (FO) used as fuel in manufacturing, even ... - Issues involved:Entitlement to Modvat Credit for LDO and FO used as fuel in the manufacture of Silver and Sulphuric Acid cleared at nil rate of duty.Analysis:1. Appellant's Argument: The appellant argued that Modvat credit should be available for LDO and FO even when cleared at nil rate of duty, citing the Tribunal judgment in Commissioner of Central Excise v. Sudarsanam Spinning Mills and other related rulings. The appellant contended that these judgments support the availability of Modvat credit in such cases.2. Revenue's Argument: The Revenue contended that Rule 57C(1) clearly states that Modvat credit is not applicable to goods cleared without payment of duty. The Revenue sought a review of the order, referencing the Larger Bench's decision in Kirloskar Oil Engines Ltd. v. CCE, Pune, which denied Modvat credit for inputs used in final products cleared at nil rate of duty.3. Judicial Analysis: The Tribunal analyzed the applicability of Rule 57C(1) and the interpretations of related rules. The Tribunal distinguished the case from Kirloskar Oil Engines Ltd., stating that the issue in question pertained to Modvat credit for fuels, covered under different legal provisions. The Tribunal referenced the judgment in CCE, Tirunelveli v. Sudarsanam Spinning Mills, which addressed the availment of Modvat credit for inputs used in manufacturing both dutiable and exempted goods.4. Precedent and Decision: The Tribunal highlighted the findings in CCE, Tirunelveli v. Sudarsanam Spinning Mills, emphasizing the interpretation of Rule 6 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2002, regarding the eligibility for Modvat credit on inputs used as fuel. The Tribunal upheld the appellant's argument, following the precedent set in previous cases and setting aside the impugned order, granting consequential relief if necessary.In conclusion, the judgment clarified the entitlement to Modvat credit for LDO and FO used as fuel in the manufacture of goods cleared at nil rate of duty, based on a thorough analysis of relevant legal provisions and precedents. The decision aligned with previous rulings and upheld the appellant's right to claim Modvat credit in the given circumstances.