Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the time spent before the wrong forum could be excluded for the purpose of limitation and the appeal before the Tribunal treated as within time; (ii) Whether the request for conversion of free shipping bills into shipping bills under the VKGUY scheme could be allowed by amendment or endorsement under the Customs law.
Issue (i): Whether the time spent before the wrong forum could be excluded for the purpose of limitation and the appeal before the Tribunal treated as within time.
Analysis: The appeal had first been pursued before the Commissioner (Appeals), who held that the remedy lay before the Tribunal. The period spent before that forum was directed to be excluded while considering limitation, and the subsequent approach to the Tribunal was treated as within the permissible time.
Conclusion: The appeal was treated as within limitation and the objection on that score did not defeat the proceedings.
Issue (ii): Whether the request for conversion of free shipping bills into shipping bills under the VKGUY scheme could be allowed by amendment or endorsement under the Customs law.
Analysis: The export incentive scheme had been made applicable by notification with retrospective effect from 1-4-2008, while the exports were made later. The relevant procedure required declaration of intent on free shipping bills, but also contemplated that for exports made prior to the date of notification such declaration would not be required. The record showed that endorsement was sought on the basis of documentary evidence already in existence at the time of export, and refusal to permit amendment was inconsistent with Section 149 of the Customs Act, 1962.
Conclusion: The request for amendment and endorsement was allowed, and the shipping bills were directed to be endorsed to extend the VKGUY benefit.
Final Conclusion: The exporter succeeded in obtaining relief for conversion or endorsement of the shipping bills, and the proceedings were finally concluded in its favour.
Ratio Decidendi: Amendment or endorsement of shipping documents may be permitted under Section 149 of the Customs Act, 1962 when the claim is supported by documentary evidence that existed at the time of export and the procedural requirement is not indispensable on the facts of the case.