Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether refund of Special Additional Duty could be denied solely because the description of imported goods in the Bills of Entry differed from the description in the domestic sales invoices, when the conditions of the refund notification and circulars stood complied with.
Analysis: The refund conditions under the notification and the connected circulars were found to have been satisfied. The imported goods were identifiable from the invoices through the Bills of Entry references, the declaration denying availability of SAD credit to the buyer, and the indication of VAT/CST on the sales. The description in the Bills of Entry was more elaborate, while the domestic invoices used a shorter trade description. The discrepancy was therefore held to be only a change in description, not a failure of compliance. A slight variation in wording of the invoice description, by itself, was held not to justify denial of refund where the import, sale, and tax-payment trail was otherwise established.
Conclusion: The refund could not be denied on the ground of description mismatch, and the assessee was entitled to the SAD refund.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the prescribed refund conditions are otherwise fulfilled and the imported goods can be correlated with the domestic sales through contemporaneous documents, a mere variation in description between import and sale documents does not defeat entitlement to SAD refund.