Agricultural income exemption applies to Mysore coffee sale proceeds where only ordinary market-preparatory processing occurred.

Income from coffee grown in Mysore and sold in British India was treated as arising or accruing in the Indian State for the second proviso to Section 4(2) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, so the assessee qualified for the exemption. The Court held that ordinary post-harvest steps taken to make the produce marketable did not amount to manufacturing, and the exemption was therefore not limited to the raw value of the beans. On that basis, the full sale realisation, not merely the agricultural input value, remained outside the taxable charge in British India.

---

---

Issues: (i) whether the assessee's income derived from the sale in British India of coffee grown in Mysore was exempt under the second proviso to Section 4(2) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922; (ii) whether, if exempt, the relief extended to the whole sale proceeds or only to the value of the raw coffee beans in Mysore.

Issue (i): whether the assessee's income derived from the sale in British India of coffee grown in Mysore was exempt under the second proviso to Section 4(2) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922

Analysis: The exemption turned on whether income from produce grown in an Indian State could be treated as having arisen or accrued outside British India even though the sale proceeds were realised in British India. The Court rejected the narrower view that only sale converts produce into income and held that, for agricultural produce from the assessee's own estate, the receipt of the produce and its subsequent realisation could still amount to income arising or accruing in the State. The proviso was treated as a deliberate exemption from the general charging scheme and was read to protect the foreign agricultural income of this kind from taxation in British India.

Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to the benefit of the second proviso to Section 4(2).

Issue (ii): whether, if exempt, the relief extended to the whole sale proceeds or only to the value of the raw coffee beans in Mysore

Analysis: The Court held that the relevant post-harvest operations did not amount to a manufacturing process but were only ordinary steps taken by a cultivator to render produce fit for market. On that footing, the assessee stood on the same basis as a cultivator of coffee in British India selling his own produce, and the exemption could not be confined to the raw value of the beans. The statutory conception of agricultural income was treated as reflecting the business sense of income from agriculture, subject only to exclusion where a distinct manufacturing process intervened.

Conclusion: The exemption covered the entire sale price realised in Mangalore.

Final Conclusion: The income from the Mysore coffee estates, as realised on sale in Mangalore, was held outside British India's taxable charge under the proviso relied upon, and the entire sale realisation was treated as exempt.

Ratio Decidendi: Agricultural produce grown in an Indian State and sold in British India may still be treated as income arising or accruing in the State for the purpose of the statutory exemption, and where only ordinary market-preparatory processing occurs, the exemption extends to the full sale proceeds rather than merely the raw agricultural value.

---