TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>High Court and Privy Council affirm Indian income-tax liability for Patiala State Bank under Government Trading Taxation Act.</h1> <h3>Patiala State Bank Versus Commissioner of Income-Tax, Bombay</h3> Patiala State Bank Versus Commissioner of Income-Tax, Bombay - [1943] 11 ITR 617 Issues:1. Applicability of the Government Trading Taxation Act to the Patiala State Bank for taxation under the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922.2. Tax liability on property acquired by the bank and income from investments in British India.3. Validity of the income-tax assessment for the year 1935-36 on the Patiala State Bank.Analysis:The Patiala State Bank, owned by the Maharaja of Patiala, collected interest on Government of India securities and profits from investments in British India through its agents. The Income-tax Officer assessed the bank for the year 1935-36 under the Government Trading Taxation Act, 1926. The Act imposes taxation on a Government carrying on trade or business, including income arising in connection with the business. The bank contended that the Act only applies to businesses in British India. The High Court held that the Act applies to any business of a Dominion Government, making it liable to Indian income-tax, irrespective of the business location. The bank's appeal against the assessment was dismissed.The High Court addressed specific questions regarding the bank's property in Mussoorie, profits from investments, income from investments in British India, and the validity of the income-tax assessment. The Court found that income derived from the property was taxable as business income but ruled that the property was not occupied for business purposes. The Court affirmed that profits from investments and income from investments in British India were subject to taxation. Consequently, the income-tax assessment for the year 1935-36 on the bank was deemed legal and valid.The bank argued that the Act of 1926 was invalid, but the Court rejected this contention. The Court emphasized that the Act applies to any business of a Dominion Government, making it liable to Indian income-tax for income received in British India. The High Court's reasoning was upheld by the Privy Council, affirming that the bank's income, profits, and gains received in British India were taxable under the Act of 1922, similar to a company. Therefore, the assessment on the bank was deemed valid, and the appeal was dismissed with costs awarded to the respondent.In conclusion, the Privy Council upheld the High Court's decision, affirming the applicability of the Government Trading Taxation Act to the Patiala State Bank and the validity of the income-tax assessment for the year 1935-36. The judgment emphasized that the Act applies to all businesses of a Dominion Government, irrespective of the business location, for taxation under the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922.
TaxTMI 