Letters Patent appeal under Section 6 proceedings remains maintainable despite the statutory bar on appeal or revision.

Section 6(3) of the Specific Relief Act bars appeal or revision against orders passed under that provision, but the statutory bar does not by itself exclude intra-court appellate jurisdiction preserved by clause 15 of the Letters Patent unless there is express exclusion. Where a Single Judge of the High Court acts in original jurisdiction under Section 6, an appeal to the Division Bench remains maintainable under clause 15. The objection based on Section 6(3) therefore fails where the Letters Patent jurisdiction is not expressly taken away.

---

---

Issues: Whether an appeal lay to the Division Bench of the High Court against an order passed by a Single Judge in proceedings under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act.

Analysis: Section 6(3) of the Specific Relief Act bars appeal or revision against an order passed under that section. However, a statutory bar does not by itself exclude the appellate jurisdiction preserved by clause 15 of the Letters Patent unless there is an express exclusion. As the impugned order was passed by a Single Judge of the High Court in exercise of original jurisdiction, the intra-court appeal fell within clause 15 and remained maintainable.

Conclusion: The appeal was maintainable and the objection based on Section 6(3) failed.

---