Voluntary compounding of sales tax offence bars later revision challenge once the compounding order is accepted.

A dealer who voluntarily sought compounding of a sales tax offence and paid the compounding fee could not later invoke revision under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act once the competent authority accepted the offer. Acceptance of the compounding application completed the compounding transaction, leaving the dealer no longer a person entitled to object to the order. The statutory revision remedy was therefore unavailable because it is confined to a person with a legitimate grievance against the order. The distinction between compounding and assessment proceedings did not assist the dealer, and the rejection of the revisions was sustained.

---

---

Issues: Whether a dealer who voluntarily offered compounding of a sales tax offence and paid the compounding fee could still maintain revision against the compounding order under sections 36 and 38 of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963.

Analysis: The application for compounding was made after inspection, and the offer was accepted by the competent authority with receipt of the compounding fee. Once the offer to compound is accepted, the compounding process stands completed. In such circumstances, the dealer ceases to be a person objecting to an order within the meaning of sections 36 and 38. The statutory remedy of revision is available only to a person who can legitimately object to the order, and a party who has voluntarily sought and completed compounding cannot later challenge that very order. The distinction drawn in the cited precedent between compounding proceedings and assessment proceedings did not assist the dealer, because the present case concerned the finality of a completed compounding transaction.

Conclusion: The revision petitions were not maintainable, and the rejection of the revisions was upheld.

Ratio Decidendi: A dealer who voluntarily applies for and completes compounding of an offence under the Act is not an aggrieved person entitled to invoke the statutory revision remedies against the compounding order.

---