Business expense deduction fails where litigation costs are not wholly and exclusively incurred to earn profits.

Litigation expenses paid by a newspaper company to defend contempt proceedings against its editor and printer were held not deductible because they were not shown to have been incurred wholly and exclusively for the purpose of earning business profits. A mere business connection, incidental indemnity, or moral obligation was insufficient; the expenditure had to be really incidental to the earning of profits. On the materials before the taxing authority, there was no basis to treat the payment as laid out to augment profits, so the deduction claim failed under the business-expense provision.

---

---

Issues: Whether litigation expenses incurred by a newspaper company in defending contempt proceedings against its editor and printer were expenditure incurred solely for the purpose of earning profits within Section 10(2)(ix) of the Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 and deductible in computing business profits.

Analysis: The expenditure was not shown to have been laid out to earn profits or gains of the assessee's business. The contempt proceedings were against the editor and printer, and the payment by the company was at most a moral or incidental indemnity. A disbursement is deductible only if it is wholly and exclusively laid out for the purpose of the trade and is really incidental to earning profits. Mere connection with the business, or payment out of business motives, is insufficient. On the materials before the taxing authority, there was no basis for concluding that the expenditure was incurred for the purpose of augmenting profits.

Conclusion: The expenditure was not allowable as a deduction under Section 10(2)(ix); the answer to the reference was in the negative, against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.

Ratio Decidendi: For deduction under the business-expense provision, the expenditure must be shown to have been incurred wholly and exclusively for the purpose of earning profits, and a mere incidental, remote, or moral connection with the business does not suffice.

---