1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Penalty on disallowed administrative expenses overturned on appeal due to lack of specific identification</h1> The penalty imposed on disallowance of administrative expenses under section 14A for the assessment year 2002-03 was the subject of appeal. The penalty ... - Issues involved: Penalty u/s.271(1)(c) on disallowance out of administrative expenditure u/s.14A for A.Y. 2002-03.Summary:The appeal was filed against the penalty imposed on disallowance of expenses u/s.14A for earning exempt income. The AO levied the penalty specifically on disallowance of &8377; 66,31,05,360/- made u/s.14A out of administrative and other expenses for earning exempt dividend and interest income. The assessee contended that no expenses were incurred for earning the exempt income. The AO, however, rejected this explanation and levied the penalty. The CIT(A) held that penalty on disallowance of interest u/s.14A was not justified but upheld the penalty on disallowance of administrative expenses on a proportionate basis.The CIT(A) justified the penalty on administrative expenses disallowance, stating that there was substantial tax-free income and expenses could be attributed to earning this income. The assessee argued that no expenses were directly or indirectly related to earning dividend income. The Tribunal observed that the AO did not point out any expenses related to earning exempt income and the disallowance was made on an adhoc basis. The Tribunal found no reason to confirm the penalty on such adhoc disallowance of administrative expenditure u/s.14A. Consequently, the penalty sustained by the CIT(A) was set aside and deleted, allowing the appeal filed by the assessee.In conclusion, the penalty on the disallowance of administrative expenditure u/s.14A was deleted, and the appeal was treated as allowed.