Tribunal overturns CIT(A) order, remands Rs. 56 lakh transaction case for fresh review

The Tribunal set aside the Ld CIT(A)'s order deleting Rs. 56 lakhs under section 68 of the IT Act and remanded the matter for fresh consideration. The Ld CIT(A) was directed to assess the reasonableness of receiving high premium shares and the genuineness of the transaction, allowing both parties a fair hearing. The revenue's appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.

---

---

Issues:
- Appeal against order of Ld CIT(A) for assessment year 2001-02.
- Deletion of addition of Rs. 56,00,000 made under section 68 of the IT Act.
- Failure to prove source and creditworthiness of creditors/share applicants.

Analysis:

Issue 1: Appeal against Ld CIT(A) Order
The revenue appealed against the order of the Ld CIT(A) for the assessment year 2001-02. The grounds raised by the revenue included the contention that the Ld CIT(A)'s order was erroneous and contrary to facts and law.

Issue 2: Deletion of Addition under Section 68
The Assessing Officer made an addition of Rs. 80.85 lakhs on account of share capital received during the year, with a premium of Rs. 490 per share. The Ld CIT(A) deleted the addition of Rs. 56 lakhs, citing that it was received from reputed companies through account payee cheques, and all companies were income tax assesses with PAN numbers and income tax returns. The remaining balance addition was also deleted by the Ld CIT(A) as it was not received during the year under consideration. The revenue contended that the shares of the assessee did not command a premium of Rs. 490 per share, and this aspect needed further examination.

Issue 3: Failure to Prove Source and Creditworthiness
The revenue argued that the assessee failed to discharge the onus of proving the source and creditworthiness of the creditors/share applicants. The Ld CIT(A) was requested to pass a speaking order on whether the receipt of high premium share of Rs. 490 per share was reasonable and if the transaction was genuine, providing an opportunity for both sides to be heard.

In conclusion, the Tribunal set aside the Ld CIT(A)'s order regarding the deletion of Rs. 56 lakhs and restored the matter back to the Ld CIT(A) for a fresh decision. The Ld CIT(A) was instructed to examine whether the receipt of high premium shares was reasonable and if the transaction was genuine, providing a speaking order and adequate opportunity for both parties. The appeal of the revenue was allowed for statistical purposes.

---