2010 (4) TMI 1158 - AT - Income Tax

Tax Appeal: Legal Expenses Disallowance & Business Income Assessment; Penalty Cancelled

Navinchandra N. Majithia Versus Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, 24 (2), Mumbai

The appeal in ITA No.18/Mum/2004 involved the disallowance of legal expenses and the assessment of surplus on sale of shares as business income. The ... - Issues involved: Assessment of legal expenses as business expenditure, assessment of surplus on sale of shares as business income, imposition of penalty under section 271(1)(c).ITA No.18/Mum/2004:The assessee, engaged in share trading and deriving income from other sources, appealed against the disallowance of legal expenses and the assessment of surplus on sale of shares as business income instead of short term capital gains. The legal expenses were incurred in connection with a dispute with M/s. J.B. Holdings Ltd. The Assessing Officer disallowed the legal expenses, holding they should be capitalized. The assessee claimed the legal expenses should be allowed against interest income under section 57(iii). The Tribunal directed fresh consideration by the Assessing Officer to determine the nexus between legal charges and interest income. Regarding the surplus on sale of shares, the Tribunal restored the issue to the Assessing Officer to verify delivery of shares and the consistent treatment of such gains as capital gains. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.ITA No.7424/Mum/2005:The appeal was against the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) consequent to the assessment of surplus on sale of shares as business income. As the issue was restored to the Assessing Officer in ITA No.18/Mum/2004, the penalty was cancelled, and the appeal was allowed.Conclusion:ITA No.18/Mum/2004 allowed for statistical purposes, and ITA No.7424/Mum/2005 allowed.