TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>High Court stresses statutory timelines in block assessment appeals, emphasizes procedural adherence</h1> <h3>Commissioner of Income-tax Versus Kuwer Industries Ltd.</h3> The High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeals regarding block assessment under section 158BE of the Income-tax Act, emphasizing the importance of ... - Issues:1. Limitation period for block assessment under section 158BE of the Income-tax Act, 1961.Analysis:The High Court of Delhi heard appeals by the Revenue against an order made by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal regarding block assessment for the period 1-4-1985 to 30-6-1996. The main issue raised was about the limitation period for assessment as per section 158BE of the Income-tax Act, which requires assessments to be completed within a specified time frame to avoid being time-barred.The relevant provision of section 158BE states that the order under section 158BC should be passed within one year from the end of the month in which the last authorization for search or requisition was executed. The Tribunal noted that the search in this case was concluded on 20th March, 1996, and opined that if there was no authorization after the search date, the assessment should have been passed on or before 31-3-1997 to avoid being time-barred.The Tribunal specifically highlighted that a restraint order passed on 27-6-1996 could not be equated with the required authorization for assessment. It was emphasized that the authorization needed approval from the Director of Income-tax, Investigation, or the Commissioner of Income-tax, which was not present in this case.The case hinged on a panchnama dated 20th March, 1996, which was executed on 21-3-1996, signifying the conclusion of the search. The Tribunal noted that a subsequent panchnama, not produced before them, was raised by the Revenue's counsel, but since it was not part of the record and was not considered by the Assessing Officer or the Tribunal, it could not be relied upon to alter the assessment timeline.The High Court directed the Commissioner of Income-tax to administratively examine the matter, specifically mentioning a panchnama dated 25-2-1997 that was not presented before the Assessing Officer or the Tribunal. The Court stressed the importance of all relevant documents being considered during assessments to ensure compliance with the statutory timelines. The appeal was disposed of with instructions for the Commissioner to report on the matter within three months.In conclusion, the Court dismissed the appeals as they did not raise any substantial questions of law, emphasizing the importance of adherence to procedural requirements and timely submission of all relevant documents during assessments to avoid issues related to limitation periods under the Income-tax Act.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
