Tribunal rules Industrial Promotion Assistance as capital receipt, exempt from income tax

The Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeals, ruling that the reopening of assessments under section 147 read with section 148 was legally flawed. The Industrial Promotion Assistance received was deemed a capital receipt exempt from income tax, contrary to the Assessing Officer's classification as a revenue receipt. The Tribunal emphasized consistency in treatment of the assistance, aligning with past decisions and concluding that the relief granted in earlier years should not be disturbed in subsequent assessments.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Jurisdiction regarding reopening u/s 147 r.w.s. 148.
2. Nature of receipt: Whether capital or revenue received on account of Industrial Promotion Assistance under the West Bengal Industrial Promotion (Assistance to Industrial Units) Scheme, 1994.

Summary:

Jurisdiction regarding reopening u/s 147 r.w.s. 148:
The assessee's original returns were processed u/s 143(1), and subsequently, the Assessing Officer (AO) initiated action u/s 148 for framing assessment by issuing notice u/s 148. The AO recorded reasons based on the Tax Audit Report, which indicated that the assessee received Rs. 23,16,824/- as industrial promotional assistance from the Government of West Bengal, regarded as a capital receipt and not offered for taxation. The AO relied on the decisions in Sahney Steel & Press Work Ltd. vs. CIT (1997) 228 ITR 253 (SC) and Keshoram Industries & Cotton Mills Ltd. vs. CIT (1991) 191 ITR 518 (Kol.), concluding that the operational subsidy should be regarded as a revenue receipt. The CIT(A) upheld the AO's action, but the Tribunal found that the AO had overlooked the Tribunal's earlier decision in favor of the assessee for the assessment year 1995-96, where the Industrial Promotion Assistance was treated as a capital receipt. The Tribunal held that reopening the assessment was bad in law, as the AO cannot disturb the relief granted in initial years on the same issue in subsequent years.

Nature of receipt:
The dispute centered on whether the Industrial Promotion Assistance received under the West Bengal Industrial Promotion (Assistance to Industrial Units) Scheme, 1994, was a capital or revenue receipt. The AO treated the assistance as a revenue receipt assessable u/s 28(iiib) of the Act, relying on the decisions in Sahney Steel & Press Work Ltd. vs. CIT and Keshoram Industries & Cotton Mills Ltd. vs. CIT. The CIT(A) upheld this view, stating that the assistance was closely linked to the carrying on of production and should be treated as revenue. However, the Tribunal found that the assistance was designed to tide over the financial crisis faced by some specified industries and was intended to supplement capital, not trading receipts. The Tribunal concluded that the Industrial Promotion Assistance was a capital receipt exempt from income tax, aligning with the decision in CIT v. P. J. Chemicals Ltd. [1994] 210 ITR 830.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal allowed the appeals of the assessee, holding that the reopening of assessments was bad in law and that the Industrial Promotion Assistance received was a capital receipt exempt from income tax. The order was pronounced in the open court on 29.4.2011.

---