Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the applicant's salary and related employment remuneration were liable to tax in India under Article 16 of the India-U.S. DTAA, and whether the exception in Article 16(2) applied so as to make the income taxable only in the State of residence.
Analysis: The applicant was a resident of the U.S.A. and was present in India only for a brief period within the relevant year. The remuneration was paid by the foreign employer, and although an Indian entity made the initial payment of certain amounts, those amounts were reimbursed by the foreign employer. On the facts stated, the employment remuneration was not borne by a permanent establishment or fixed base in India, and the conditions of Article 16(2) were satisfied.
Conclusion: The applicant's remuneration was not taxable in India under the treaty, and question No. 1 was answered in the negative, in favour of the applicant. The remaining questions did not require adjudication.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a non-resident employee satisfies the treaty conditions for dependent personal services, including the 183-day presence test and the requirement that remuneration is not borne by a permanent establishment in the source State, the salary is taxable only in the State of residence.