Just a moment...
We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic
• Quick overview summary answering your query with references
• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
• Detailed report covering:
- Overview Summary
- Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
- Relevant Case Laws
- Tariff / Classification / HSN
- Expert views from TaxTMI
- Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.
Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, on the facts of this case, Section 9(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1922 is attracted so as to require separate assessments of property income on the persons owning the properties.
Analysis: Section 9(3) provides that where property is owned by two or more persons and their respective shares are definite and ascertainable, such persons shall not be assessed as an association of persons and each owner's share of income shall be included in his total income. Although shares may be ascertainable in theory under applicable inheritance rules, the statutory requirement demands that the shares be definite in the sense of being fixed, exact and clear. Ongoing civil litigation between co-heirs over succession and the question whether customary law or Muhammadan law governs the inheritance prevents the shares being treated as fixed or definite. In those circumstances the tax authorities could not lawfully treat the assessee as the sole individual owner or arbitrarily exclude other heirs from assessment.
Conclusion: Section 9(3) is not attracted on these facts; the requirement of definite and ascertainable shares is not satisfied while the inheritance dispute remains pending. The question referred is answered in the negative. The decision is against the assessee.