Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner, a works contractor executing work for a wholly owned Government company, was entitled to the concessional compounded tax rate of 5% under Section 8 of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act for works contract awarded by the Government of Kerala, Kerala Water Authority, or local authorities.
Analysis: The claimed concession was confined to works contracts awarded by the Government of Kerala, Kerala Water Authority, or local authorities. A Government company was held not to be equivalent to the Government of Kerala for the purpose of extending the concession. Since exemption and concession provisions in fiscal statutes are to be strictly construed against the assessee, the benefit could not be enlarged to cover Government companies.
Conclusion: The petitioner was not entitled to the 5% concessional compounded rate, and the deduction at 7% was upheld against the petitioner.