Tribunal grants appeal on various issues incl. accrued liability provision, commission payment, & investment allowance.

The Tribunal allowed the appellant's appeal on multiple issues, including disallowance of provision for accrued liability for Leave Travel Assistance, disallowance of commission payment to M/s. Rajesh Agency, and allowance of investment allowance on fire hydrants, exhaust fans, and a computer installed in the factory. The Tribunal held that the appellant was entitled to deductions based on the accepted accounting methods and evidence provided, dismissing the revenue's appeals on these matters.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Disallowance of provision for accrued liability for Leave Travel Assistance.
2. Disallowance of commission payment to M/s. Rajesh Agency.
3. Allowance of investment allowance on fire hydrants and exhaust fans.
4. Allowance of investment allowance on the cost of computer installed in the factory.
5. Disallowance calculation for employee directors.

Issue 1: Disallowance of Provision for Accrued Liability for Leave Travel Assistance

The appellant, maintaining books on a mercantile basis, provided for Leave Travel Assistance (LTA) liability based on accrual. The dispute arose from the Assessing Officer's addition of the variance between actual payment and provision made. The Tribunal held that the liability to pay LTA was clear, and the provision was justified as per the contract with employees. The method of accounting was consistent and accepted, entitling the appellant to deduction based on actual accrued liability. The addition was deleted.

Issue 2: Disallowance of Commission Payment to M/s. Rajesh Agency

The appellant claimed a deduction for commission paid to M/s. Rajesh Agency, supported by evidence. The Assessing Officer disallowed the claim due to inability to verify the agency's existence at the given address. The Tribunal found the evidence furnished by the appellant sufficient to discharge the onus, and the Assessing Officer's failure to establish the agency's non-existence at the relevant time led to the disallowance being overturned.

Issue 3: Allowance of Investment Allowance on Fire Hydrants and Exhaust Fans

The CIT(A) directed the allowance of investment allowance on fire hydrants and exhaust fans, treating them as part of the plant for manufacturing goods. The revenue contended that the machinery should be involved in production. The Tribunal, following a decision of the Karnataka High Court, dismissed the revenue's appeal, stating that deduction is permissible for machinery installed in the business of manufacturing, regardless of direct involvement in the production process.

Issue 4: Allowance of Investment Allowance on Computer Installed in the Factory

The CIT(A) allowed investment allowance on the cost of a computer installed in the factory, in line with a decision of the Calcutta High Court. The Tribunal upheld this decision, stating that the computer installed for the business of manufacture qualifies for the investment allowance deduction.

Issue 5: Disallowance Calculation for Employee Directors

The issue of disallowance calculation for employee directors was resolved in favor of the assessee, citing a Supreme Court decision. The disallowance was to be worked out in accordance with section 40(c) and not section 40A(5), leading to the dismissal of the revenue's appeal.

In conclusion, the Tribunal allowed the appellant's appeal while dismissing the revenue's appeal on various grounds related to the disallowance and allowance of deductions and provisions.

---