Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the sum received as compensation for the use of machinery was income liable to income-tax.
Analysis: The receipt was not part of a capital settlement for the value of the machinery, but was paid in full settlement of a claim specifically made for compensation for the use of the machinery by the mills. Even though the partnership had not carried on business, the amount represented profits arising from the user of a partnership asset or an asset held in common, and was therefore assessable as income under the head of income from other sources. The receipt was neither a mere adjustment of capital value nor a casual non-taxable receipt.
Conclusion: The amount of Rs. 75,000 was income liable to income-tax and the question was answered in the affirmative against the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Compensation received for the commercial use of a capital asset, where it arises from the exploitation of that asset and not from a capital transfer, is taxable as income.