Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Tribunal allows depreciation claim on vehicles registered in Director's name The Tribunal allowed the appeal, permitting the depreciation claim on vehicles despite being purchased in the Director's name. Relying on the Supreme ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Tribunal allows depreciation claim on vehicles registered in Director's name
The Tribunal allowed the appeal, permitting the depreciation claim on vehicles despite being purchased in the Director's name. Relying on the Supreme Court precedent in ICDS Ltd, the Tribunal overturned the disallowance made by the Assessing Officer and upheld by the Ld. CIT(A). The depreciation claim of Rs. 5,12,405 was allowed, emphasizing that ownership by the Director did not preclude the company from claiming depreciation.
Issues: Disallowance of depreciation claimed on motor car due to vehicles not being registered in the name of the company.
Analysis: The appeal pertains to the disallowance of depreciation claimed on a motor car because the vehicles were not registered in the name of the company. The Assessing Officer found that the vehicle was purchased in the name of the Director, prompting the query on why depreciation should not be disallowed. The assessee contended that ownership of the vehicles by the Director did not negate the company's ownership, as all expenses were accounted for by the company. The AO, however, insisted that ownership was essential for depreciation claims and disallowed the depreciation.
The matter was taken to the Ld. CIT(A) without success. During the appeal, the assessee's counsel referenced a Tribunal decision in a similar case and the Supreme Court's ruling in ICDS Ltd Vs CIT 350 ITR 527, arguing for the allowance of depreciation. The Departmental Representative supported the Revenue authorities' stance but failed to present a distinguishing decision in their favor.
Upon review, the Tribunal found merit in the assessee's argument. Citing the precedent set by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in ICDS Ltd, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the claim for depreciation on vehicles even if purchased in the Director's name. The Tribunal set aside the Ld. CIT(A)'s findings and directed the AO to permit the depreciation claim of Rs. 5,12,405. Consequently, the appeal by the assessee was allowed, and the decision was pronounced in an open court hearing on 1st December 2015.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) ✕
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter. 
of 
TaxTMI 
