Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to interest on delayed refund of customs duty under section 27A when the refund application was said to be incomplete for want of original documents.
Analysis: The refund arose from the allowance of the valuation appeal, and the application for refund was filed on 27 July 2009. The objection that the application was incomplete was not supported by any deficiency being notified to the applicant. Under the Explanation to Rule 2 of the Customs Refund Application (Form) Regulation, 1995, interest under section 27A runs from the date a complete application, acknowledged by the proper officer, is made. Regulation 23 required return of a deficient application within ten days so that defects could be cured, but no such course was adopted. In the absence of any communicated deficiency, the application had to be treated as complete, and failure to refund within three months attracted statutory interest.
Conclusion: The appellant was entitled to interest on the refunded amount under section 27A of the Customs Act.