Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a finding in assessment proceedings that a receipt represented income from undisclosed sources constituted material to sustain a penalty for concealment under section 28(1)(c) of the Indian Income-tax Act, and whether the penalty could be justified on the facts.
Analysis: The finding recorded in the assessment proceedings that the amount represented income from undisclosed sources was a relevant and sufficient material for the penalty proceedings. Once the receipt was held to be income and it had not been disclosed in the return, concealment followed. That material was not conclusive, but it was enough to support a finding of concealment unless rebutted. The second question was not treated as an independent question of law, because whether a finding should be recorded on available material is a matter of discretion and appreciation of evidence. The absence of any rebuttal in the penalty proceedings reinforced the conclusion that concealment had been established.
Conclusion: The answer on concealment was in the affirmative, and the penalty under section 28(1)(c) was upheld.
Ratio Decidendi: A prior finding in assessment proceedings that an amount is income from undisclosed sources is relevant material sufficient to support a penalty finding for concealment under section 28(1)(c), unless rebutted in the penalty proceedings.