Just a moment...
We've upgraded AI Tools on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic
• Quick overview summary answering your query with references
• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
• Detailed report covering:
- Overview Summary
- Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
- Relevant Case Laws
- Tariff / Classification / HSN
- Expert views from TaxTMI
- Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.
Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a writ of mandamus should be issued directing the Income-tax Tribunal to state a case on the question whether interest paid to a non-resident creditor is deductible under the proviso to Section 10(2)(iii) when the creditor himself has been assessed in British India.
Analysis: The proviso to the deduction provision permits allowance where there is an agent in British India who may be assessed; the statutory text distinguishes the mere existence of an agent from the principal's assessability under Section 42. The proper statutory trigger for allowing the deduction is assessment of the principal or of a person on his behalf in respect of the identical item of interest; assessability of the principal alone, without assessment in respect of the specific item by an agent or by a person assessed on his behalf, does not satisfy the proviso. The tribunal's observation that the creditor had submitted returns and that the department should await completion of the creditor's assessment is appropriate; if the creditor is assessed for the identical item, the assessee may seek refund from the department rather than obtain mandamus against the Tribunal.
Conclusion: The petition for a writ of mandamus to direct the Tribunal to state a case is refused; the assessee's remedy is to seek refund from the Income-tax department if the creditor is assessed for the same item.