Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        1965 (4) TMI 120 - HC - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Bad debt deductibility: partner advances consistently treated as interest-bearing can be deductible; dissolution liabilities remain capital losses. The court addressed whether amounts arising from partnership dissolution qualify as deductible bad debts under section 10(2)(xi) of the Income-tax Act. It ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Bad debt deductibility: partner advances consistently treated as interest-bearing can be deductible; dissolution liabilities remain capital losses.

                          The court addressed whether amounts arising from partnership dissolution qualify as deductible bad debts under section 10(2)(xi) of the Income-tax Act. It held that Rs. 78,974, being advances over agreed capital consistently recorded and treated as interest-bearing loans in accounts and prior assessments and recognised by partnership law as payable ahead of capital, is a business debt and allowable as a bad debt. By contrast, Rs. 26,600 allotted as a liability on dissolution and Rs. 12,000 unpaid on a promissory note were characterised as capital in nature and disallowed as capital losses.




                          Issues: (i) Whether the sum of Rs. 78,974 advanced to the firm can be allowed as a bad debt deductible under section 10(2)(xi) of the Income-tax Act; (ii) Whether the sum of Rs. 26,600 allotted as a liability on dissolution is allowable as a bad debt; (iii) Whether the unrecovered balance of Rs. 12,000 in respect of a promissory note taken on dissolution is deductible as a bad debt under section 10(2)(xi).

                          Issue (i): Whether Rs. 78,974 is a deductible bad debt under section 10(2)(xi) of the Income-tax Act.

                          Analysis: The partnership deed distinguished between initial capital and further advances by partners, providing for interest at six percent on further advances. The advances were recorded and treated in accounts and assessments as interest-bearing advances in the money-lending business over several years. Partnership law (sections 13(d) and 48 of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932) recognises a partner's entitlement to interest on advances and ranks such advances for payment on dissolution ahead of capital distribution. The consistent prior treatment in accounts and past assessments of interest on these advances supports treating them as business loans rather than as additional capital, and this consistent mode of treatment requires satisfactory material before being displaced.

                          Conclusion: The claim for Rs. 78,974 is allowed as a bad debt deductible under section 10(2)(xi) of the Income-tax Act; conclusion in favour of the assessee.

                          Issue (ii): Whether Rs. 26,600, an allotted liability on dissolution, is deductible as a bad debt under section 10(2)(xi).

                          Analysis: The sum of Rs. 26,600 was an item of firm liability allotted to the partner on dissolution and arose as an incident of the partnership transaction. There is no material to show it was converted into or constituted a money-lending advance made in the course of the assessee's money-lending business.

                          Conclusion: The claim for Rs. 26,600 is disallowed as a capital loss; conclusion against the assessee.

                          Issue (iii): Whether Rs. 12,000, being the unrecovered balance of a promissory note taken on dissolution, is deductible as a bad debt under section 10(2)(xi).

                          Analysis: Part of the overall sum due on dissolution represented an express capital relinquishment and liabilities allotted which the continuing partner agreed to discharge; the arrangement and the character of the items indicate that the relinquished portion and liabilities are capital in nature. The mere fact that the assessee carried on a money-lending business is insufficient, without clear evidence that the specific sum was incorporated into and treated as part of the money-lending business, to convert the loss into a deductible business bad debt.

                          Conclusion: The claim for Rs. 12,000 is disallowed as a capital loss; conclusion against the assessee.

                          Final Conclusion: The appeal is partly successful - one claimed item (Rs. 78,974) is allowable as a deductible bad debt under section 10(2)(xi) while the other two claimed items (Rs. 26,600 and Rs. 12,000) are capital losses and are disallowed.

                          Ratio Decidendi: Where a partner's advances over and above agreed capital are consistently treated in accounts and assessments as interest-bearing advances and partnership law recognises such advances as distinct from capital, those advances may constitute business debts deductible as bad debts under section 10(2)(xi); absent such consistent treatment or supporting material, liabilities arising on dissolution are capital losses.


                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found