Execution compromise must be read as a whole; default in instalment payment did not revive the waived original claim.

A compromise recorded in execution proceedings is legally permissible and may be enforced by the executing court. The settlement must be read as a whole to determine its true intent and effect. On that construction, the balance payable under the execution compromise, with interest, remained within the framework of the original decree, and the amount earlier waived did not crystallise into a separate decree. Default in instalment payment therefore did not revive the abandoned claim, especially where the later orders extending time had attained finality and the compromise had been acted upon by payment.

---

---

Issues: Whether the consent order recorded in execution proceedings had to be construed as a whole, and whether default in payment revived the appellant's original waived claim.

Analysis: A compromise entered into at the execution stage is legally permissible and can be recorded and enforced by the executing court. The consent order had to be read in its entirety to ascertain its true intent and purport. On that reading, the balance amount payable under the execution compromise, together with interest, was not less than the amount payable under the original consent decree, and the amount waived by the appellant had not merged into any decree. The words used in the undertaking were understood in the context of the execution settlement, and the clause did not entitle the appellant to resurrect the earlier waived claim on default. The later orders extending time had attained finality, and the compromise was acted upon by payment of the decretal amount.

Conclusion: The consent order was valid and enforceable, and the original waived claim did not revive on default. The appeal failed.

Ratio Decidendi: A compromise recorded in execution proceedings must be construed as a whole, and where the settlement remains within the framework of the decree and the waived claim never crystallised into a separate decree, default in instalment payment does not revive the abandoned original claim.

---