Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Rule 3(a) of the Madhya Pradesh Prisoner's Release on Probation Rules, 1964 was ultra vires Section 2 and Section 9(4) of the Madhya Pradesh Prisoner's Release on Probation Act 1954 by excluding prisoners convicted under specified offences, including Section 396 of the Indian Penal Code, from consideration for release on probation.
Analysis: The Act embodied a reformative policy under which release on probation was intended only for certain prisoners who, having regard to their antecedents and conduct in prison, were likely to abstain from crime and lead peaceable lives. Section 9(4) expressly empowered the Government to frame rules defining the classes of offenders who may be conditionally released and the periods of imprisonment after which they may be so released. Rule 3(a), by excluding prisoners convicted of specified serious offences, operated as a permissible classification of offenders within the rule-making power and did not destroy the object of the Act. The delegated legislation was therefore held to be consistent with the enabling statute and not repugnant to Section 2.
Conclusion: Rule 3(a) was valid and not ultra vires the Act; the prior view holding otherwise was overruled, and the State's appeal succeeded.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the enabling Act authorises classification of offenders for conditional release, a rule excluding specified serious categories of offenders from probation is valid delegated legislation and does not become ultra vires merely because it limits the field of eligibility under the statute.