Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether butter manufactured by co-operative societies from cream purchased from farmers could be treated as an agricultural product of the members so as to qualify the appellant rural society for exemption from income tax under the relevant statutory provision.
Analysis: The exemption depended on whether the relevant butter was, vis-a-vis the appellant, an agricultural product of its members. Butter produced in factory operations from cream obtained from many sources was not a product of the use of the factory land. The incorporated definition had to be read in its own statutory setting, but the relevant provisions of the co-operation legislation showed a distinction between agricultural products and products manufactured out of agricultural products. The finished product here resulted from a distinct butter-making industry, separate from the farming activity that produced milk and cream. Although butter might in some settings be an agricultural product, butter made by manufacturing societies from cream after the raw material had left the farm was not in any real sense the product of the use of the farmers' land.
Conclusion: The claimed exemption failed and the butter was not an agricultural product of the members for purposes of the income-tax exemption.