Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, on the facts and circumstances of the case, an order under section 23A of the Indian Income-tax Act could be sustained having regard to the company's commercial profits, tax liability, and losses of earlier years.
Analysis: The relevant enquiry under section 23A was whether, from the standpoint of a prudent businessman, it would have been reasonable to declare a larger dividend than the one declared, after taking into account the commercial profits actually available for distribution. In computing distributable profits, the approximate tax liability on the commercial profits had to be deducted, and the losses incurred in earlier years also had to be considered as required by the section. The Tribunal's approach in ignoring the earlier loss because reserves existed was not accepted, since the manner in which a businessman chooses to adjust losses against current profits or reserves is a matter for business judgment and not for direction by the tax authorities.
Conclusion: The order under section 23A was not justified and the question was answered in favour of the assessee.