Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Court affirms Cenvat credit eligibility for catering & transportation services. Precedent upheld.</h1> <h3>Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax Versus M/s. Thiru Arooran Sugars Ltd. and Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal</h3> Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax Versus M/s. Thiru Arooran Sugars Ltd. and Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal - 2015 (39) ... Issues Involved:1. Eligibility of Cenvat credit on service tax paid for outdoor catering services in the factory.2. Eligibility of Cenvat credit on service tax paid for outward transportation of final products beyond the place of removal.Detailed Analysis:Issue 1: Eligibility of Cenvat Credit on Outdoor Catering ServicesThe core issue is whether the assessee can utilize Cenvat credit for service tax paid on outdoor catering services provided in the factory for its employees. The Tribunal allowed the appeal by holding that Cenvat credit is admissible on 'outdoor catering service' as an input service relating to business, following the Larger Bench decision in Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai V. GTC Industries Ltd. and ABB Ltd. Vs. CCE Bangalore.This Court referenced a similar case (C.M.A.Nos.2 of 2010 batch) where it was held that outdoor catering services are covered under the inclusive part of the definition of 'input service.' The Bombay High Court in CCE V. Ultratech Cement Ltd. concluded that the definition of 'input service' is broad, covering services used directly or indirectly in or in relation to the manufacture of final products, as well as services used in relation to the business of manufacturing the final products. The Court noted that the definition includes services integrally connected with the business, such as mandatory canteen facilities under the Factories Act, 1948.The Court emphasized that the definition of 'input service' is not restricted and includes all services used in relation to the business of manufacturing the final product. The Tribunal's decision to allow Cenvat credit on outdoor catering services was upheld, provided the cost of the food borne by the worker is not included.Issue 2: Eligibility of Cenvat Credit on Outward Transportation ServicesThe second issue concerns whether services availed for outward transportation of final products beyond the place of removal qualify as an input service under Rule 2 (1) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The Tribunal's decision was based on the Larger Bench decision in ABB Ltd. v. CCE, which held that outward transportation services up to the place of removal are eligible for Cenvat credit.The Karnataka High Court in CCE V. ABB Ltd. clarified that the definition of 'input service' includes services used directly or indirectly in or in relation to the manufacture of final products and clearance from the place of removal. The Court noted that the definition is extensive and includes transportation charges from the place of removal to the customer, as long as it is integrally connected with the business of manufacturing the final product.However, the Court also emphasized that the definition should not be expanded to include transportation beyond the place of removal unless explicitly stated. The amendment effective from 01.04.2008, which substituted 'from' with 'up to' in the phrase 'clearance of final products from the place of removal,' clarified the legislative intent.Conclusion:The Court concluded that the issues are settled in favor of the assessee based on the precedents and legislative amendments. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the Tribunal's order, with no costs.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found