Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Tribunal grants relief under section 80IB(10) for timely completion of project.</h1> <h3>M/s. Ujjwal Construction Versus The Income Tax Officer, Ward 1 (3), Pune</h3> M/s. Ujjwal Construction Versus The Income Tax Officer, Ward 1 (3), Pune - TMI Issues Involved:1. Entitlement to claim relief under section 80IB(10) of the Income-tax Act.2. Correct interpretation of provisions of section 80IB(10).3. Validity of orders passed by the Assessing Officer (A.O.) and Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)].4. Direction to accept the return of income claiming relief under section 80IB(10).Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:1. Entitlement to claim relief under section 80IB(10):The primary issue is whether the assessee is entitled to claim deduction under section 80IB(10) of the Income-tax Act. The assessee firm undertook a project for constructing residential premises named Ujjwal Gardens at Vadgaon Sheri, Pune, and claimed deduction on the profits arising from this project. The Assessing Officer (A.O.) disallowed the deduction due to the absence of a Completion Certificate from the Pune Municipal Corporation by the stipulated date of 31.03.2008. The CIT(A) upheld this decision, emphasizing the statutory requirement of submitting a completion certificate from the local authority for the grant of deduction.2. Correct interpretation of provisions of section 80IB(10):The CIT(A) and A.O. interpreted section 80IB(10) to require a Completion Certificate from the local authority as a mandatory condition for claiming the deduction. The assessee argued that the project was completed within the stipulated time, as evidenced by occupation and ancillary certificates from various departments, despite the lack of a formal Completion Certificate due to litigation with the Pune Municipal Corporation. The Tribunal referred to the Hon'ble Delhi High Court's decision in CIT vs. CHD Developers Ltd., which held that the requirement for a completion certificate was not applicable to projects approved before 01.04.2005. Since the assessee's project was approved before this date, the Tribunal concluded that the non-obtaining of the completion certificate should not bar the deduction claim.3. Validity of orders passed by the A.O. and CIT(A):The Tribunal found that the orders passed by the A.O. and CIT(A) were not in accordance with the law, as they failed to consider the completion of the project based on the evidence provided by the assessee. The Tribunal noted that the project was completed and occupied by the stipulated date, and individual completion certificates had been issued to some flat owners. The Tribunal held that the denial of the deduction solely based on the absence of a completion certificate from the Pune Municipal Corporation was not justified.4. Direction to accept the return of income claiming relief under section 80IB(10):The Tribunal directed the A.O. to allow the assessee's claim for deduction under section 80IB(10), affirming that the project was completed within the stipulated time and that the requirement for a completion certificate was not applicable to the assessee's case. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, setting aside the orders of the A.O. and CIT(A).Conclusion:The Tribunal concluded that the assessee was entitled to claim the deduction under section 80IB(10) of the Income-tax Act, as the project was completed within the stipulated time and the requirement for a completion certificate was not applicable. The orders of the A.O. and CIT(A) were set aside, and the A.O. was directed to allow the deduction claimed by the assessee. The appeal of the assessee was allowed.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found