1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Tribunal rules in favor of assessing multi-piece cosmetics package under Central Excise Act</h1> The Tribunal ruled in favor of assessing the multi-piece package of cosmetics under Sec. 4 of the Central Excise Act, 1944, allowing the appellant's stay ... - The issue in the appeal was whether a multi-piece package of lipstick, mascara, and eye liner should be taxed under Sec. 4 or Sec. 4A of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The appellant's contention that Sec. 4 should apply was rejected by lower authorities citing a previous court decision. However, a Larger Bench of the Tribunal ruled in favor of assessing the goods under Sec. 4, which was subsequently upheld in another case involving similar goods. As a result, the Tribunal allowed the appellant's stay petition unconditionally and scheduled the appeal for final disposal on 21.8.2006.