Central excise valuation of cosmetic packages favored Section 4 treatment and supported unconditional interim stay.

A multi-piece package of lipstick, mascara and eye liner was examined for valuation under the Central Excise Act, with the Tribunal considering whether assessment should fall under Section 4 or Section 4A. It noted that a larger bench had already held similar goods to be assessable under Section 4, and that the same view had been followed in a later tribunal decision involving identical goods. On that basis, the appellant was found to have a strong prima facie case on merits, and unconditional stay was granted pending final disposal of the appeal.

---

---

Issues: Whether the multi-piece package of lipstick, mascara and eye liner was assessable under Section 4 or Section 4A of the Central Excise Act, 1944, and whether unconditional stay should be granted pending final disposal of the appeal.

Analysis: The Tribunal noted that the larger bench had already held that similar goods were required to be assessed under Section 4, and that this view had been followed in another subsequent tribunal decision involving identical goods. On that basis, the appellant was found to have a good prima facie case on merits for interim relief.

Outcome: Unconditional stay was granted and the appeal was directed for final disposal on a later date.

---