Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether refund of Special Additional Duty on imported used tyres was admissible when the goods were consumed in the process of converting them into crumb rubber and VAT was paid only on the sale of the resultant product.
Analysis: The refund notification was intended for trading imports satisfying its conditions, and the importer's consumption of the goods did not by itself establish entitlement to refund. The crucial inquiry was not whether the process amounted to manufacture, but whether the levy of Special Additional Duty on the imported used tyres was offset by tax treatment in the domestic market. Since a domestic producer using locally procured used tyres would bear tax on purchase of the tyres and on sale of the finished crumb rubber, payment of VAT on crumb rubber did not extinguish the liability attached to the imported used tyres. The cited circular on fraudulent 4% SAD claims also supported a restrictive reading of the refund scheme.
Conclusion: The refund was not admissible and the denial of refund was in law; the appeal failed.
Final Conclusion: The importer was held not entitled to SAD refund on the imported used tyres, and the order rejecting the refund was sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: Refund of Special Additional Duty under the notification is not available merely because VAT is paid on the sale of the processed product when the imported goods are consumed in the process and the tax incidence on the imported input is not otherwise neutralised.