Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether tarpaulin cloth was correctly classifiable under Chapter 5207 or under Heading 5906.90.
Analysis: The dispute concerned the proper tariff classification of tarpaulin cloth. The Tribunal followed the earlier view that the issue had already been exhaustively examined and that tarpaulin cloth fell under Heading 5207 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, and not under Heading 5906.90. Since the classification question stood settled in favour of the assessee, the demand based on the contrary classification could not survive.
Conclusion: Tarpaulin cloth was held classifiable under Chapter 5207 and not under Heading 5906.90, in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a prior binding classification ruling has determined the proper tariff entry for the same goods, the goods must be classified in accordance with that settled entry and not under a competing heading adopted by the department.