Belated retraction after survey surrender did not displace the addition where surrounding material supported the assessment.

Addition based on a survey statement was sustained where the assessee could not explain the material found during survey and had surrendered income during the proceedings. A belated retraction, made after a substantial delay and without satisfactory explanation, did not by itself displace the evidentiary value of the surrender, especially when the surrounding material supported the addition and the lower authorities had recorded concurrent findings of fact. The issue was decided against the assessee.

---

---

Issues: Whether the addition made on the basis of the statement recorded during survey, coupled with the belated retraction, was sustainable in law.

Analysis: The assessee failed to explain the material found during survey and had surrendered income during the proceedings. The retraction was made after a substantial delay without a satisfactory explanation. In such circumstances, a belated retraction does not by itself displace the evidentiary value of the surrender, particularly where the surrounding material supports the addition and the authorities below have recorded concurrent findings on facts.

Conclusion: The addition based on the survey proceedings and the surrender was upheld, and the issue was decided against the assessee.

---