1996 (5) TMI 427 - SC - Indian Laws

Supreme Court's Directions on Criminal Cases Nationwide: Bail, Trial Prioritization, and Timely Resolution

Common Cause A Registered Society Thru. Its Director Versus Union Of India

Common Cause A Registered Society Thru. Its Director Versus Union Of India - 1996 AIR 1619, 1996 (2) Suppl. SCR 196, 1996 (4) SCC 33, 1996 (4) JT 701, ... Issues involved: Request for general directions in criminal cases pending in courts nationwide.Summary:The judgment by the Supreme Court addresses the plea by a registered society seeking directions under Article 32 of the Constitution of India regarding cases pending in criminal courts across the country. The society requested various directions, including quashing proceedings against those accused of Motor Vehicles Act offenses pending for over a year, releasing accused in cases pending for more than three years with maximum sentences of six months, and dismissing proceedings against those in custody for over three years for offenses punishable with not more than seven years. The Court acknowledged the need for such directions to prevent oppression and protect the rights of citizens as guaranteed by Article 21 of the Constitution. Consequently, the Court issued detailed directions applicable not only to specific states but to all states and union territories. These directions cover bail provisions based on offense severity and trial duration, discharge or acquittal of accused in pending cases, and prioritization of certain offenses for trial. The judgment emphasizes the importance of timely resolution of criminal cases to prevent undue hardship and oppression. The writ petition was disposed of with the mentioned directions, with no costs incurred. High Courts were instructed to ensure compliance and report back within three months.