Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the sum of Rs. 3,56,054, being the amount required to be credited to the life insurance fund to make good an actuarial deficit, could be treated as an amount reserved for policy-holders so as to attract the deduction under rule 3(a) of the Schedule to the Income-tax Act.
Analysis: The deduction under rule 3(a) is attracted only where the insurer, out of a disposable surplus, voluntarily pays, reserves, or expends amounts for the benefit of policy-holders. The amount in question was not part of a free surplus at the company's disposal. It had to be credited to the life insurance fund under the statutory obligation to meet existing and contingent liabilities of policy-holders, and therefore did not represent a benefit conferred on policy-holders by the company's volition.
Conclusion: The amount of Rs. 3,56,054 was not an amount reserved for policy-holders within rule 3(a), and no deduction was allowable in respect of it.
Final Conclusion: The reference was answered against the assessee and the Revenue's view on deductibility was upheld.
Ratio Decidendi: A deduction for amounts reserved for policy-holders is allowable only when the insurer, from a disposable surplus, voluntarily applies the amount for the policy-holders' benefit; a statutorily compelled credit to the life fund to make good an actuarial deficit does not qualify.