Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether cenvat credit of National Calamity Contingent Duty could be denied merely because the supplier was unregistered at the time of supply, where the duty was subsequently paid and a supplementary invoice was issued.
Analysis: Rule 3 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2001 permits credit of NCCD leviable under Section 136 of the Finance Act, 2001. Rule 7(2) recognises a supplementary invoice as a valid document for availing credit. The supplier subsequently paid the duty and issued the supplementary invoice after registration, and the duty-paid character of the goods, their receipt, and their use in manufacture were not in dispute. In such circumstances, denial of credit solely on the ground that the supplier was unregistered at the time of clearance was not justified.
Conclusion: Cenvat credit was admissible to the assessee and could not be denied on the ground of the supplier's earlier non-registration.
Ratio Decidendi: Where duty-paid goods are received and utilised for the intended purpose, and the law recognises a supplementary invoice as a valid document, credit cannot be denied merely because the supplier was unregistered at the time of supply.