Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the deduction under section 36(1)(viii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for the relevant assessment years had to be computed on 25 per cent of the total income before deduction under Chapter VI-A alone, or on the total income before deduction both under Chapter VI-A and under section 36(1)(viii) itself.
Analysis: The expression used in the unamended provision was construed in the light of the statutory context and the definition of total income, with emphasis on the phrase "unless the context otherwise requires" in section 2 of the Act. The Court preferred the reasoning of several High Courts that the context of section 36(1)(viii) required the deduction base to be read as total income after excluding the deduction under the very clause in question as well as deductions under Chapter VI-A. The subsequent 1985 amendment, which expressly inserted the words "and this clause", was treated as supportive of that interpretation for the earlier years.
Conclusion: The deduction under section 36(1)(viii) for the assessment years in question had to be computed on 25 per cent of the total income before making any deduction under Chapter VI-A and before making any deduction under section 36(1)(viii) itself, and the answer was against the Revenue.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the statutory context so requires, the expression "total income" in a deduction provision may be construed to exclude the deduction under that very provision as well as other linked deductions, even before an express amendment clarifies the position.