Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        1961 (2) TMI 71 - SC - Indian Laws

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Municipal octroi levy upheld on substantial compliance, statutory authority, limited delegation, and broad coverage of raw cotton and wool. A municipal octroi levy was upheld where the statutory steps were substantially complied with, because technical defects in notice or publication did not ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Municipal octroi levy upheld on substantial compliance, statutory authority, limited delegation, and broad coverage of raw cotton and wool.

                          A municipal octroi levy was upheld where the statutory steps were substantially complied with, because technical defects in notice or publication did not vitiate the proceeding absent prejudice to the merits. The levy on raw cotton and wool was held authorised by the charging and rate provisions and the schedule, and a separate preliminary resolution was unnecessary where the same resolution identified the goods and fixed the levy. The delegation to the municipal body was treated as conditional legislation, since the Act supplied the policy and limits. The expression "raw cotton and wool" was held to include processed or compressed goods. Constitutional questions on Articles 276 and 301 were referred to a Constitution Bench.




                          Issues: (i) Whether the publication requirements and procedural steps for imposing octroi under the municipal Act were substantially complied with; (ii) Whether the levy on raw cotton and wool was authorised under the charging and rate provisions of the Act and Schedule III; (iii) Whether the delegation to the Corporation to specify additional goods for octroi was excessive; (iv) Whether the expression "raw cotton and wool" covered processed or compressed cotton and wool.

                          Issue (i): Whether the publication requirements and procedural steps for imposing octroi under the municipal Act were substantially complied with.

                          Analysis: The statutory scheme required an initial notice of intention, consideration of objections, and then a resolution determining levy, followed by publication of notice of the levy. The notice issued at the first stage was treated as sufficient despite technical variation in wording, and the later publication difficulty was examined as a procedural irregularity. The Court also noted the saving provision that defects or irregularities not affecting the merits of the case do not vitiate the proceeding.

                          Conclusion: The procedural objections were not accepted as fatal.

                          Issue (ii): Whether the levy on raw cotton and wool was authorised under the charging and rate provisions of the Act and Schedule III.

                          Analysis: The Act empowered the Corporation to levy octroi on goods brought within the octroi limits, and the schedule permitted octroi on other articles approved by the Corporation within the prescribed ceiling. The resolution identified the goods and fixed the rate. A separate prior resolution merely for listing the goods was held unnecessary where the same resolution effectively chose the goods and fixed the levy in the manner contemplated by the Act.

                          Conclusion: The levy was within the statutory authority.

                          Issue (iii): Whether the delegation to the Corporation to specify additional goods for octroi was excessive.

                          Analysis: The statutory framework itself laid down the policy and limits of taxation, while leaving only the choice of additional goods and the conditions of levy to the municipal body. That arrangement was treated as conditional legislation rather than an uncontrolled delegation of legislative power.

                          Conclusion: The delegation was not excessive.

                          Issue (iv): Whether the expression "raw cotton and wool" covered processed or compressed cotton and wool.

                          Analysis: The notification expressly included both loose and compressed goods. Cotton that had been ginned or pressed did not cease to be raw cotton for purposes of the levy, and the same reasoning applied to wool.

                          Conclusion: The levy covered the goods in dispute.

                          Final Conclusion: The non-constitutional objections were rejected, while the constitutional questions concerning Articles 276 and 301 and the effect of non-publication in the Government Gazette were referred for determination by a Constitution Bench.

                          Ratio Decidendi: A municipal octroi levy will not fail for a mere technical irregularity where the statutory procedure is substantially complied with, the levy is authorised by the enabling Act and schedule, and the delegation is limited by legislative policy and prescribed conditions.


                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found