Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Tribunal could reasonably hold, on the facts found, that the purchase and sale of shares constituted an adventure in the nature of trade and that the resulting loss was a trade loss allowable in assessment.
Analysis: In a reference, the Court was bound by the findings of fact recorded by the Tribunal unless those findings were unsupported by evidence, contrary to the evidence, or capricious. On the facts found, the shares were purchased and sold at prevailing market rates, borrowed funds were used, the assessee had among its objects the business of dealing in shares, and there was no evidentiary foundation for treating the transaction as a mere investment or as an unreal market manipulation. The mere circumstance that the shares ultimately came into the hands of another connected company did not, by itself, establish that the transaction was not genuine or that it was an investment transaction.
Conclusion: The Tribunal was entitled to infer that the transaction was an ordinary business transaction in shares and that the loss was a trade loss. The question was answered in the affirmative, in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: In a tax reference, where the Tribunal's findings of fact are supported by evidence, the Court will uphold its inference that a share transaction is an adventure in the nature of trade if the transaction is genuine, carried out at market rates, and consistent with the assessee's business objects.